Martin Young - Web Designer


January 31, 2008

The Mystery of the Missing Exif data

I’ll try to keep this short so that it doesn’t look like I’m obsessed by it.

As you’ll have noticed if you’ve had a look at this blog in the last few months, or take a look right now at the Flickr badge in my sidebar, I’m experimenting with moblogging with my Sony Ericsson T650i cameraphone, i.e. I take a photo with it and immediately email it to Flickr, which I’ve set up to automatically post the photo to this blog (that only works sporadically, but that’s another story).

A bit more background info: most digital cameras store metadata about the photos with each photo that you take. The metadata (known as Exif data) includes the camera type, ISO speed, focal length, date and time, plus a bunch of other stuff. Flickr displays that data next to each photo that you post there, which is useful (and interesting) if you take some sort of interest in photography, as I do.

So what’s the mystery?

At the risk of sounding like an uber-geek, the Exif data is missing from the photos that I post to Flickr. Nobody can tell me why (not Flickr, not the Get Satisfaction community, and not Sony Ericsson, at any rate), and I can’t find a straight answer anywhere on the web, which is saying something.

T650i photos from other users are on Flickr with their Exif data intact, and my original photos also have their data, so I reckon one of the following must be happening:

  • The phone’s built-in editing software is stripping the metadata from the photo when it’s resizing it before sending the email. There is a setting on the phone to turn Picture Rescaling on or off, but that’s only available on MMSs, not emails.
  • My mobile carrier (3) is stripping the data from the photo during its handling of the email.
  • A setting either in the metadata or on Flickr is preventing the Exif data from being displayed. There’s a setting in my Flickr profile to Hide/Display Exif data - that’s set to Display. I’m thinking there’s a different setting somewhere.

When I get home tonight I think I’ll try to upload one of my phone photos (an original, un-resized one) via Flickr Uploadr. So more later………

*Update*: As suspected, it’s the phone’s built-in editing software. An original, un-resized photo bluetoothed to my computer then uploaded to Flickr via Uploadr DOES show Exif data, whereas a photo resized by the phone bluetoothed and then uploaded via Uploadr does not. Mystery solved.

Comments (2)

Posted by Marty in Moblogging, Random thoughts, Web & Tech


Desk in negative



Desk in negative, originally uploaded by martinjy.

Comments (0)

Posted by Marty in Moblogging


January 30, 2008

Drab



Drab, originally uploaded by martinjy.

Comments (0)

Posted by Marty in Moblogging


January 25, 2008

Morning run



Morning run, originally uploaded by martinjy.

Morning run

Comments (0)

Posted by Marty in Moblogging


January 24, 2008

LP Portraits

Just found this fantastic Flickr group. Speaks for itself.

Comments (1)

Posted by Marty in Web & Tech


So true



So true, originally uploaded by martinjy.

So true

Comments (0)

Posted by Marty in Moblogging


Lazy authors and the suspension of disbelief

I read around 40-50 books a year. Travelling on a train two hours a day, four days a week will do that to you (although recently I’m all over the iPod videos, but that’s another post for another day).

Every now and again I’ll read a business book or an autobiography, but most of the books I read are what I’d loosely term pulpy crime/law novels from authors like James Patterson, Ian Rankin, Michael Connelly, and so on. They’re usually based around a recurring character (Alex Cross, John Rebus, Jack Reacher etc) and rely heavily on sharp dialogue and a twisting plotline to keep you interested.

All of them set their stories in real places (Washington, LA, Scotland) to add some credibility and “suspend your disbelief”, as the saying goes, but I’ve noticed that more and more of the books written recently are also based around a real event. The one I’m reading at the moment, for example, is based in Scotland at the time of the G8 summit and Make Poverty History events.

Why is this happening? Have the authors have run out of ideas? Are they too lazy to dream up a scenario? Are the readers are more likely to suspend their disbelief if the location and the timing of the story are real? Do the authors and/or publishers think that the characters and dialogue can’t carry a story on their own any more?

It’s hard to pin down the reason, but personally I don’t like it. It blurs the line between fact and fiction too much and I don’t want that from this type of book. Give me a fast-talking LA lawyer with a bunch of intertwined cases, some lifestyle, and a twist at the end and I’m happy.

Comments (0)

Posted by Marty in Random thoughts


Older Posts »